- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy M14 vs Poco C65
Samsung Galaxy M14 vs Xiaomi Poco C65
What Galaxy M14 does better (11) and where Poco C65 wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.8Display4.9
4.6Performance2.4
5.2Camera4.6
7.5Battery3.1
7.1Features5.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy M14Poco C65
| Galaxy M14 | Poco C65 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 166.8 mm | 168 mm | −1.2 mm |
| Width | 77.2 mm | 78 mm | −0.8 mm |
| Thickness | 9.4 mm | 8.1 mm | +1.3 mm |
| Weight | 206 g | 192 g | +14 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy M14 better than Poco C65?
- AnTuTu score607,489 vs 242,8852.5×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,963 vs 1,201+63%
- 5GYes · Poco C65: No
- Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+20%
- Wired charging25 W vs 18 W+39%
- Pixel density400 ppi vs 260 ppi+54%
- Process5 nm vs 12 nm2.4×
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2 GHz+20%
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 8 MP+62%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 720 px+50%
- Charged in 30 min30% vs 28%+7%
Why is Poco C65 better than Galaxy M14?
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- RAM6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
- Peak brightness450 nits vs 600 nits+33%
- Storage (base)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Weight206 g vs 192 g+7%
- Screen size6.6″ vs 6.7″+2%
- Thickness9.4 mm vs 8.1 mm+16%
- Screen-to-body ratio81.5% vs 83.7%+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 206 g | 192 g |
| Thickness | 9.4 mm | 8.1 mm |
| Height | 166.8 mm | 168 mm |
| Width | 77.2 mm | 78 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Colours | Navy Blue, Light Blue, Silver | Black, Blue, Purple |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | PLS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,408 px | 1,600 px |
| Pixel density | 400 ppi | 260 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 450 nits | 600 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 607 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 81.5% | 83.7% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Exynos 1330 | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 |
| Chip maker | Exynos | MediaTek |
| Process | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MP2 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 607,489 | 242,885 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,963 | 1,201 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 364 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.76" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 11.5 h |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 18 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 30% | 28% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -31.4 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.48 W/kg | 0.99 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI core 5.1 | HyperOS 2 |
