- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy M14 vs Spark 20 Pro
Samsung Galaxy M14 vs Tecno Spark 20 Pro
What Galaxy M14 does better (5) and where Spark 20 Pro wins (13) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.8Display6.5
4.6Performance4.9
5.2Camera6.6
7.5Battery6.0
7.1Features4.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy M14Spark 20 Pro
| Galaxy M14 | Spark 20 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 166.8 mm | 168.6 mm | −1.8 mm |
| Width | 77.2 mm | 76.6 mm | +0.6 mm |
| Thickness | 9.4 mm | 8.4 mm | +1 mm |
| Weight | 206 g | 206 g | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy M14 better than Spark 20 Pro?
- 5GYes · Spark 20 Pro: No
- Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+20%
- AnTuTu score607,489 vs 586,415+4%
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+9%
- Process5 nm vs 6 nm+20%
Why is Spark 20 Pro better than Galaxy M14?
- Main camera50 MP vs 108 MP2.2×
- RAM6 GB vs 12 GB2×
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Stereo speakersNo · Galaxy M14: Yes
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Wired charging25 W vs 33 W+32%
- Storage (base)64 GB vs 256 GB4×
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 32 MP2.5×
- Peak brightness450 nits vs 580 nits+29%
- Charged in 30 min30% vs 50%+67%
- Screen size6.6″ vs 6.8″+3%
- Thickness9.4 mm vs 8.4 mm+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 206 g | 206 g |
| Thickness | 9.4 mm | 8.4 mm |
| Height | 166.8 mm | 168.6 mm |
| Width | 77.2 mm | 76.6 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | — |
| Colours | Navy Blue, Light Blue, Silver | Moonlit Black, Frosty Ivory, Sunset Blush, Magic Skin 2.0 Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | PLS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,408 px | 2,460 px |
| Pixel density | 400 ppi | 396 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 450 nits | 580 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 81.5% | 84.5% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Exynos 1330 | Mediatek Helio G99 |
| Chip maker | Exynos | MediaTek |
| Process | 5 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MP2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 607,489 | 586,415 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,963 | 1,928 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 364 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.67" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 30% | 50% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.48 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI core 5.1 | HIOS 13 |
