- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy M14 vs Y200
Samsung Galaxy M14 vs Vivo Y200
What Galaxy M14 does better (6) and where Y200 wins (13) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.8Display7.5
5.2Camera6.1
7.5Battery5.1
7.1Features4.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy M14Y200
| Galaxy M14 | Y200 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 166.8 mm | 162.4 mm | +4.4 mm |
| Width | 77.2 mm | 74.9 mm | +2.3 mm |
| Thickness | 9.4 mm | 7.7 mm | +1.7 mm |
| Weight | 206 g | 190 g | +16 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy M14 better than Y200?
- Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 4,800 mAh+25%
- NFCYes · Y200: No
- Memory card slotYes · Y200: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Y200: No
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2 GHz+20%
- Process5 nm vs 6 nm+20%
Why is Y200 better than Galaxy M14?
- Wired charging25 W vs 44 W+76%
- OLED panelNo · Galaxy M14: Yes
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- RAM6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
- Peak brightness450 nits vs 800 nits+78%
- Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
- Charged in 30 min30% vs 80%2.7×
- Storage (base)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Weight206 g vs 190 g+8%
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 16 MP+23%
- Thickness9.4 mm vs 7.7 mm+22%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 206 g | 190 g |
| Thickness | 9.4 mm | 7.7 mm |
| Height | 166.8 mm | 162.4 mm |
| Width | 77.2 mm | 74.9 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Glass |
| Ingress protection | — | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | — |
| Colours | Navy Blue, Light Blue, Silver | Titanium Silver, Emerald Green, Purple, Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | PLS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,408 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 400 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 450 nits | 800 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 81.5% | 88.3% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Exynos 1330 | Qualcomm SM4375 Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 |
| Chip maker | Exynos | Qualcomm |
| Process | 5 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MP2 | Adreno 619 |
| AnTuTu score | 607,489 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,963 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 364 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 4,800 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 44 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 30% | 80% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.48 W/kg | 0.99 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI core 5.1 | Funtouch 13 |
