- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy M02 vs Galaxy M51
Samsung Galaxy M02 vs Samsung Galaxy M51
What Galaxy M02 does better (2) and where Galaxy M51 wins (20) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.4Display6.0
2.7Camera7.5
2.9Features5.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy M02Galaxy M51
| Galaxy M02 | Galaxy M51 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164 mm | 163.9 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Width | 75.9 mm | 76.3 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Thickness | 9.1 mm | 9.5 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Weight | 206 g | 213 g | −7 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy M02 better than Galaxy M51?
- Weight206 g vs 213 g+3%
- Thickness9.1 mm vs 9.5 mm+4%
Why is Galaxy M51 better than Galaxy M02?
- RAM3 GB vs 8 GB2.7×
- Main camera13 MP vs 64 MP4.9×
- Storage (max)32 GB vs 128 GB4×
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 7,000 mAh+40%
- OLED panelNo · Galaxy M02: Yes
- NFCNo · Galaxy M02: Yes
- CPU frequency1.5 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+47%
- Pixel density270 ppi vs 393 ppi+46%
- Process28 nm vs 8 nm3.5×
- Storage (base)32 GB vs 128 GB4×
- Selfie camera5 MP vs 32 MP6.4×
- CPU cores4 vs 82×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 206 g | 213 g |
| Thickness | 9.1 mm | 9.5 mm |
| Height | 164 mm | 163.9 mm |
| Width | 75.9 mm | 76.3 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 3+ |
| Colours | Black, Gray, Blue, Red | Celestial Black, Electric Blue, White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | PLS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,600 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 270 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 650 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 677 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 81.9% | 86.7% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6739W | Qualcomm SDM730 Snapdragon 730G |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| CPU cores | 4 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 1.5 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8100 | Adreno 618 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 266,620 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,774 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 3 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 32 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 32 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 13 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.73" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 5 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | — | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 7,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | — | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 35% |
| Wireless charging | — | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | — | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -28.5 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | — | Side |
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.65 W/kg | 0.61 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 2.0 | One UI 4.1 |
