- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy F55 vs iQOO Neo9 Pro
Samsung Galaxy F55 vs Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro
What Galaxy F55 does better (7) and where iQOO Neo9 Pro wins (11) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.8Display9.4
8.5Camera8.9
6.8Battery8.6
8.2Features7.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy F55iQOO Neo9 Pro
| Galaxy F55 | iQOO Neo9 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.9 mm | 163.5 mm | +0.4 mm |
| Width | 76.5 mm | 75.7 mm | +0.8 mm |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 8 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Weight | 180 g | 190 g | −10 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy F55 better than iQOO Neo9 Pro?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx7 vs IPx4+75%
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 16 MP3.1×
- Memory card slotYes · iQOO Neo9 Pro: No
- 4K selfie videoYes · iQOO Neo9 Pro: No
- Weight180 g vs 190 g+6%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
- Thickness7.8 mm vs 8 mm+3%
Why is iQOO Neo9 Pro better than Galaxy F55?
- Wired charging45 W vs 120 W2.7×
- Peak brightness1,000 nits vs 3,000 nits3×
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 5,160 mAh+3%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+33%
- Max video4K vs 8K
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- Pixel density393 ppi vs 453 ppi+15%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,260 px+17%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 7+17%
- Screen-to-body ratio86.4% vs 89.7%+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 180 g | 190 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 163.9 mm | 163.5 mm |
| Width | 76.5 mm | 75.7 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP67 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | — | Schott Xensation Up |
| Colours | Black, Apricot | Fiery Red, Conqueror Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED+ | LTPO AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,260 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,800 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 453 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits | 3,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.4% | 89.7% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 644 | Adreno 740 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 2,386,903 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 5,445 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.49" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,160 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 120 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 136% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.93 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 8.5 | Funtouch 14 |
