- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy F55 vs Camon 30 Pro
Samsung Galaxy F55 vs Tecno Camon 30 Pro
What Galaxy F55 does better (6) and where Camon 30 Pro wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.8Display9.5
8.5Camera9.1
6.8Battery7.2
8.2Features5.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy F55Camon 30 Pro
| Galaxy F55 | Camon 30 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.9 mm | 164 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Width | 76.5 mm | 74.5 mm | +2 mm |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 7.7 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 180 g | 189 g | −9 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy F55 better than Camon 30 Pro?
- Stereo speakersYes · Camon 30 Pro: No
- Memory card slotYes · Camon 30 Pro: No
- 4K selfie videoYes · Camon 30 Pro: No
- Weight180 g vs 189 g+5%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 5+20%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
Why is Camon 30 Pro better than Galaxy F55?
- Wired charging45 W vs 70 W+56%
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 3.1 GHz+29%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- Screen-to-body ratio86.4% vs 89.9%+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 180 g | 189 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 7.7 mm |
| Height | 163.9 mm | 164 mm |
| Width | 76.5 mm | 74.5 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP67 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx7 | — |
| Colours | Black, Apricot | Iceland Basaltic Dark, Alps Snowy Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED+ | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,436 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | — | 998 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.4% | 89.9% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 Ultimate |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 644 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 949,357 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,931 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 1,727 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 14.5 h |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 70 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 64% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -25.5 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.93 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 8.5 | HIOS 15 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 2 |
