- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy F54 vs Redmi Note 12T Pro
Samsung Galaxy F54 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 12T Pro
What Galaxy F54 does better (9) and where Redmi Note 12T Pro wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.2Display7.0
8.8Camera7.2
8.4Battery8.0
8.0Features6.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy F54Redmi Note 12T Pro
| Galaxy F54 | Redmi Note 12T Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.9 mm | 163.6 mm | +1.3 mm |
| Width | 77.3 mm | 74.3 mm | +3 mm |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 8.9 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Weight | 199 g | 200 g | −1 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy F54 better than Redmi Note 12T Pro?
- Main camera108 MP vs 64 MP+69%
- OLED panelYes · Redmi Note 12T Pro: No
- Optical stabilisationYes · Redmi Note 12T Pro: No
- Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 5,080 mAh+18%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Memory card slotYes · Redmi Note 12T Pro: No
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
- 4K selfie videoYes · Redmi Note 12T Pro: No
- Thickness8.4 mm vs 8.9 mm+6%
Why is Redmi Note 12T Pro better than Galaxy F54?
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Stereo speakersNo · Galaxy F54: Yes
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 3.1 GHz+29%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Galaxy F54: Yes
- Pixel density393 ppi vs 407 ppi+4%
- Process5 nm vs 4 nm+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 199 g | 200 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 8.9 mm |
| Height | 164.9 mm | 163.6 mm |
| Width | 77.3 mm | 74.3 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx3 |
| Colours | Meteor Blue, Stardust Silver | Blue, White, Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,460 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 407 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 650 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85% | 85.1% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Exynos 1380 | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 Ultra |
| Chip maker | Exynos | MediaTek |
| Process | 5 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 1,207,095 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 4,222 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 1,703 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 5,080 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | — | 67 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 75% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, ultrasound proximity, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | 1.25 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 5.1 | MIUI 14 |
| Major OS updates promised | 4 | — |
