- android.gs
- Compare
- GT Neo 5 vs Galaxy F54
Realme GT Neo 5 vs Samsung Galaxy F54
What GT Neo 5 does better (10) and where Galaxy F54 wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.3Display8.2
8.6Camera8.8
7.8Battery8.4
8.1Features8.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
GT Neo 5Galaxy F54
| GT Neo 5 | Galaxy F54 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.9 mm | 164.9 mm | −1 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 77.3 mm | −1.5 mm |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 8.4 mm | +0.5 mm |
| Weight | 199 g | 199 g | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is GT Neo 5 better than Galaxy F54?
- RAM16 GB vs 8 GB2×
- Stereo speakersYes · Galaxy F54: No
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
- CPU frequency3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+25%
- 4K video frame rate60 fps vs 30 fps2×
- Pixel density451 ppi vs 393 ppi+15%
- Rear cameras3 vs 2+50%
- Process4 nm vs 5 nm+25%
- Resolution (width)1,240 px vs 1,080 px+15%
- Screen-to-body ratio87.9% vs 85%+3%
Why is Galaxy F54 better than GT Neo 5?
- Main camera50 MP vs 108 MP2.2×
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+20%
- Memory card slotNo · GT Neo 5: Yes
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
- 4K selfie videoNo · GT Neo 5: Yes
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
- Thickness8.9 mm vs 8.4 mm+6%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 199 g | 199 g |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 8.4 mm |
| Height | 163.9 mm | 164.9 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 77.3 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | Plastic |
| Colours | Purple, Black, White | Meteor Blue, Stardust Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,240 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,772 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 451 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,400 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87.9% | 85% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | Exynos 1380 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Exynos |
| Process | 4 nm | 5 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Mali-G68 MP5 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,466,734 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,896 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 2,745 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | — |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 150 W | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 1.25 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Realme UI 5.0 | One UI 5.1 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 4 |
