- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy F54 vs Redmi K70
Samsung Galaxy F54 vs Xiaomi Redmi K70
What Galaxy F54 does better (6) and where Redmi K70 wins (13) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.2Display9.2
8.8Camera8.9
8.4Battery7.8
8.0Features9.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy F54Redmi K70
| Galaxy F54 | Redmi K70 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.9 mm | 160.9 mm | +4 mm |
| Width | 77.3 mm | 75 mm | +2.3 mm |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 8.2 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Weight | 199 g | 209 g | −10 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy F54 better than Redmi K70?
- Main camera108 MP vs 50 MP2.2×
- Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+20%
- Memory card slotYes · Redmi K70: No
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
- 4K selfie videoYes · Redmi K70: No
- Weight199 g vs 209 g+5%
Why is Redmi K70 better than Galaxy F54?
- RAM8 GB vs 16 GB2×
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 1,024 GB4×
- Stereo speakersNo · Galaxy F54: Yes
- Pixel density393 ppi vs 526 ppi+34%
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+33%
- Max video4K vs 8K
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,440 px+33%
- Process5 nm vs 4 nm+25%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 7+17%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.6+12%
- Screen-to-body ratio85% vs 89%+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 199 g | 209 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 164.9 mm | 160.9 mm |
| Width | 77.3 mm | 75 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | Glass |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Meteor Blue, Stardust Silver | Black, Silver, Blue/Green, Purple |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,440 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 3,200 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 526 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 4,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85% | 89% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Exynos 1380 | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 |
| Chip maker | Exynos | Qualcomm |
| Process | 5 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 | Adreno 740 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 1,757,044 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 5,560 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 3,600 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.6 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.55" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | — | 120 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 167% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | 1.25 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 5.1 | HyperOS |
| Major OS updates promised | 4 | — |
