- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy F17 vs Pova Slim
Samsung Galaxy F17 vs Tecno Pova Slim
What Galaxy F17 does better (6) and where Pova Slim wins (13) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.3Display9.8
4.9Performance5.0
7.9Camera5.3
5.4Battery7.8
7.0Features6.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy F17Pova Slim
| Galaxy F17 | Pova Slim | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.4 mm | 164.2 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Width | 77.9 mm | 75.9 mm | +2 mm |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 6 mm | +1.5 mm |
| Weight | 192 g | 156 g | +36 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy F17 better than Pova Slim?
- Optical stabilisationYes · Pova Slim: No
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,242 vs 1,988+13%
- Memory card slotYes · Pova Slim: No
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Pova Slim: No
- Dual SIMYes · Pova Slim: No
- Process5 nm vs 6 nm+20%
Why is Pova Slim better than Galaxy F17?
- Peak brightness1,100 nits vs 4,500 nits4.1×
- Wired charging25 W vs 45 W+80%
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 144 Hz+60%
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- AnTuTu score571,738 vs 613,165+7%
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 5,160 mAh+3%
- Weight192 g vs 156 g+23%
- Pixel density385 ppi vs 440 ppi+14%
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.5 GHz+4%
- Thickness7.5 mm vs 6 mm+25%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,224 px+13%
- Charged in 30 min47% vs 53%+13%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 192 g | 156 g |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 6 mm |
| Height | 164.4 mm | 164.2 mm |
| Width | 77.9 mm | 75.9 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Colours | Black, Violet | Sky Blue, Slim White, Cool Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,224 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 2,720 px |
| Pixel density | 385 ppi | 440 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,100 nits | 4,500 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,578 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86% | 89.1% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Exynos 1330 | Mediatek Dimensity 6400 |
| Chip maker | Exynos | MediaTek |
| Process | 5 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MP2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 571,738 | 613,165 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,242 | 1,988 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,160 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 47% | 53% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.64 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 8.5 | HIOS 15 |
| Major OS updates promised | 6 | — |
