- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy A52s vs Redmi K40
Samsung Galaxy A52s vs Xiaomi Redmi K40
What Galaxy A52s does better (8) and where Redmi K40 wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.6Display7.9
8.7Camera6.7
3.2Battery4.2
8.2Features8.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A52sRedmi K40
| Galaxy A52s | Redmi K40 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 159.9 mm | 163.7 mm | −3.8 mm |
| Width | 75.1 mm | 76.4 mm | −1.3 mm |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 7.8 mm | +0.6 mm |
| Weight | 189 g | 196 g | −7 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A52s better than Redmi K40?
- Optical stabilisationYes · Redmi K40: No
- Main camera64 MP vs 48 MP+33%
- Memory card slotYes · Redmi K40: No
- Rear cameras4 vs 22×
- 4K selfie videoYes · Redmi K40: No
- Weight189 g vs 196 g+4%
- Pixel density407 ppi vs 395 ppi+3%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 20 MP+60%
Why is Redmi K40 better than Galaxy A52s?
- Peak brightness420 nits vs 1,300 nits3.1×
- Wired charging25 W vs 33 W+32%
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+33%
- Screen size6.5″ vs 6.7″+3%
- Thickness8.4 mm vs 7.8 mm+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 189 g | 196 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 159.9 mm | 163.7 mm |
| Width | 75.1 mm | 76.4 mm |
| Ingress protection | IP67 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx7 | — |
| Glass protection | Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | — | Black, White, Aurora |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 407 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 420 nits | 1,300 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | — | 85.9% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | — | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Adreno 650 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | — | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | — | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | — | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 4 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 4,520 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 58% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | — | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | — | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | proximity, accelerometer, gyro, compass, fingerprint | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 3.1 | MIUI 12 |
