- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy A52s 5G vs Redmi K40
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G vs Xiaomi Redmi K40
What Galaxy A52s 5G does better (9) and where Redmi K40 wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.4Display7.9
8.7Camera6.7
3.2Battery4.2
8.2Features8.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A52s 5GRedmi K40
| Galaxy A52s 5G | Redmi K40 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 159.9 mm | 163.7 mm | −3.8 mm |
| Width | 75.1 mm | 76.4 mm | −1.3 mm |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 7.8 mm | +0.6 mm |
| Weight | 189 g | 196 g | −7 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A52s 5G better than Redmi K40?
- Optical stabilisationYes · Redmi K40: No
- Main camera64 MP vs 48 MP+33%
- Memory card slotYes · Redmi K40: No
- 4K selfie videoYes · Redmi K40: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Redmi K40: No
- Weight189 g vs 196 g+4%
- Pixel density405 ppi vs 395 ppi+3%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 20 MP+60%
- Process6 nm vs 7 nm+17%
Why is Redmi K40 better than Galaxy A52s 5G?
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Wired charging25 W vs 33 W+32%
- Peak brightness800 nits vs 1,300 nits+62%
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+33%
- Screen size6.5″ vs 6.7″+3%
- Charged in 30 min53% vs 58%+9%
- Thickness8.4 mm vs 7.8 mm+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 189 g | 196 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 159.9 mm | 163.7 mm |
| Width | 75.1 mm | 76.4 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP67 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx7 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Purple, Awesome Mint | Black, White, Aurora |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 405 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 800 nits | 1,300 nits |
| Measured brightness | 800 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.9% | 85.9% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Adreno 650 |
| AnTuTu score | 429,675 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 11,060 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 685 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 4,520 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 53% | 58% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -27.5 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.88 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 6 | MIUI 12 |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy A05svsSamsung Galaxy A52s 5G4.87.7
vs
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5GvsSamsung Galaxy A327.75.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy A04svsSamsung Galaxy A52s 5G4.47.7
vs
Samsung Galaxy S23vsSamsung Galaxy A52s 5G8.57.7
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 ProvsSamsung Galaxy A52s 5G7.47.7
vs
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5GvsXiaomi Redmi Note 127.76.4

