- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy A52 vs Redmi Note 9
Samsung Galaxy A52 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
What Galaxy A52 does better (23) and where Redmi Note 9 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.9Display3.6
4.3Performance2.2
8.7Camera5.7
3.2Battery5.8
5.9Features5.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A52Redmi Note 9
| Galaxy A52 | Redmi Note 9 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 159.9 mm | 162.3 mm | −2.4 mm |
| Width | 75.1 mm | 77.2 mm | −2.1 mm |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 8.9 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Weight | 189 g | 199 g | −10 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A52 better than Redmi Note 9?
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)5,865 vs 1,2924.5×
- AnTuTu score261,282 vs 200,414+30%
- Measured brightness794 nits vs 370 nits2.1×
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 60 Hz+50%
- OLED panelYes · Redmi Note 9: No
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationYes · Redmi Note 9: No
- Stereo speakersYes · Redmi Note 9: No
- Wired charging25 W vs 18 W+39%
- RAM8 GB vs 6 GB+33%
- Main camera64 MP vs 48 MP+33%
- Peak brightness800 nits vs 450 nits+78%
Why is Redmi Note 9 better than Galaxy A52?
- Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 5,020 mAh+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 189 g | 199 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 8.9 mm |
| Height | 159.9 mm | 162.3 mm |
| Width | 75.1 mm | 77.2 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP67 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx7 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Violet, Awesome Blue | Forest Green, Midnight Grey, Polar White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 407 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 800 nits | 450 nits |
| Measured brightness | 794 nits | 370 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.1% | 83.5% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.3 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 261,282 | 200,414 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 5,865 | 1,292 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 313 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 5,020 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 18 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 50% | 38% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -27 LUFS | -30.1 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Rear |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.35 W/kg | 0.8 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 6.1 | MIUI 13 |
