- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy A52 vs Y70t
Samsung Galaxy A52 vs Vivo Y70t
What Galaxy A52 does better (14) and where Y70t wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.9Display4.1
8.7Camera5.0
3.2Battery3.0
5.9Features5.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A52Y70t
| Galaxy A52 | Y70t | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 159.9 mm | 162 mm | −2.1 mm |
| Width | 75.1 mm | 76.6 mm | −1.5 mm |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 8.5 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Weight | 189 g | 190 g | −1 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A52 better than Y70t?
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 60 Hz+50%
- OLED panelYes · Y70t: No
- Optical stabilisationYes · Y70t: No
- NFCYes · Y70t: No
- Stereo speakersYes · Y70t: No
- Wired charging25 W vs 18 W+39%
- Main camera64 MP vs 48 MP+33%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 8 MP4×
- Memory card slotYes · Y70t: No
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Y70t: No
- 4K selfie videoYes · Y70t: No
Why is Y70t better than Galaxy A52?
- 5GNo · Galaxy A52: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 189 g | 190 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 8.5 mm |
| Height | 159.9 mm | 162 mm |
| Width | 75.1 mm | 76.6 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP67 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx7 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | — |
| Colours | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Violet, Awesome Blue | Black, Blue, White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 407 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 800 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 794 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.1% | 84.4% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G | Exynos 880 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Exynos |
| Process | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.3 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Mali-G76 MP5 |
| AnTuTu score | 261,282 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 5,865 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 313 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 18 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 50% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -27 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.35 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 6.1 | Funtouch 10.5 |
