- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy A52 vs iQOO Z3
Samsung Galaxy A52 vs Vivo iQOO Z3
What Galaxy A52 does better (7) and where iQOO Z3 wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.9Display6.7
8.7Camera7.8
3.2Battery4.9
5.9Features5.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A52iQOO Z3
| Galaxy A52 | iQOO Z3 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 159.9 mm | 164 mm | −4.1 mm |
| Width | 75.1 mm | 75.3 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 8.5 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Weight | 189 g | 186 g | +4 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A52 better than iQOO Z3?
- OLED panelYes · iQOO Z3: No
- Optical stabilisationYes · iQOO Z3: No
- NFCYes · iQOO Z3: No
- Stereo speakersYes · iQOO Z3: No
- Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 4,400 mAh+2%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
- 4K selfie videoYes · iQOO Z3: No
Why is iQOO Z3 better than Galaxy A52?
- Wired charging25 W vs 55 W2.2×
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- 5GNo · Galaxy A52: Yes
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- CPU frequency2.3 GHz vs 2.8 GHz+22%
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- Process8 nm vs 7 nm+14%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 189 g | 186 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 8.5 mm |
| Height | 159.9 mm | 164 mm |
| Width | 75.1 mm | 75.3 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP67 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx7 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | — |
| Colours | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Violet, Awesome Blue | Ace Black, Cyber Blue, Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,408 px |
| Pixel density | 407 ppi | 401 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 800 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 794 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.1% | 84.5% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G | Qualcomm SDM768 Snapdragon 768G 5G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.3 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Adreno 620 |
| AnTuTu score | 261,282 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 5,865 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 313 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/1.97" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 4,400 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 55 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 50% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -27 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.35 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 6.1 | Funtouch 11.1 (International) |
