- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy A52 vs Armor 8 Pro
Samsung Galaxy A52 vs UleFone Armor 8 Pro
What Galaxy A52 does better (22) and where Armor 8 Pro wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.9Display3.0
8.7Camera3.7
3.2Battery6.3
5.9Features6.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A52Armor 8 Pro
| Galaxy A52 | Armor 8 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 159.9 mm | 166 mm | −6.1 mm |
| Width | 75.1 mm | 81.8 mm | −6.7 mm |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 15 mm | −6.6 mm |
| Weight | 189 g | 282 g | −93 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A52 better than Armor 8 Pro?
- Main camera64 MP vs 16 MP4×
- Wired charging25 W vs 15 W+67%
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 60 Hz+50%
- OLED panelYes · Armor 8 Pro: No
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationYes · Armor 8 Pro: No
- Stereo speakersYes · Armor 8 Pro: No
- Weight189 g vs 282 g+49%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 8 MP4×
- Pixel density407 ppi vs 282 ppi+44%
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Armor 8 Pro: No
Why is Armor 8 Pro better than Galaxy A52?
- Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 5,580 mAh+24%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx7 vs IPx8+14%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 189 g | 282 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 15 mm |
| Height | 159.9 mm | 166 mm |
| Width | 75.1 mm | 81.8 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Aluminium |
| Back | Plastic | Aluminium |
| Ingress protection | IP67 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Scratch-resistant glass, oleophobic coating |
| Colours | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Violet, Awesome Blue | Black, Orange, Red |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.1″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 1,560 px |
| Pixel density | 407 ppi | 282 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 800 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 794 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.1% | 67.3% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G | Mediatek MT6771 Helio P60 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.3 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Mali-G72 MP3 |
| AnTuTu score | 261,282 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 5,865 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 313 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 16 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/2.2 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.7" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 5,580 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 15 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 50% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 4.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -27 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.35 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 6.1 | — |
