- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy A36 vs Y300i
Samsung Galaxy A36 vs Vivo Y300i
What Galaxy A36 does better (17) and where Y300i wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.1Display5.9
7.9Camera4.1
4.8Battery8.4
9.4Features6.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A36Y300i
| Galaxy A36 | Y300i | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.9 mm | 165.7 mm | −2.8 mm |
| Width | 78.2 mm | 76.3 mm | +1.9 mm |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm | 8.1 mm | −0.7 mm |
| Weight | 195 g | 205 g | −10 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A36 better than Y300i?
- OLED panelYes · Y300i: No
- Optical stabilisationYes · Y300i: No
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx7 vs IPx4+75%
- Pixel density385 ppi vs 264 ppi+46%
- Selfie camera12 MP vs 5 MP2.4×
- Wired charging45 W vs 44 W+2%
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Y300i: No
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- 4K selfie videoYes · Y300i: No
- eSIMYes · Y300i: No
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+9%
Why is Y300i better than Galaxy A36?
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 6,500 mAh+30%
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 195 g | 205 g |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm | 8.1 mm |
| Height | 162.9 mm | 165.7 mm |
| Width | 78.2 mm | 76.3 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP67 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ | — |
| Colours | Lavender, Black, White, Lime | Black, Blue, Titanium |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 1,608 px |
| Pixel density | 385 ppi | 264 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,900 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 1,233 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.5% | 84.9% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6475-AB Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 | Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Adreno 613 |
| AnTuTu score | 613,492 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,917 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 912 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.96" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 12 MP | 5 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Si/C |
| Active use (test) | 11.6 h | — |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 44 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 66% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 4.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -26.2 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.53 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 9 | OriginOS 5 |
| Major OS updates promised | 6 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | C | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 2,000 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 42 h | — |
| Repairability class | C | — |
| Drop resistance class | C | — |
