- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy A32 vs Redmi Note 9T 5G
Samsung Galaxy A32 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T 5G
What Galaxy A32 does better (10) and where Redmi Note 9T 5G wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.0Display3.6
7.1Camera5.4
4.1Battery4.6
5.0Features8.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A32Redmi Note 9T 5G
| Galaxy A32 | Redmi Note 9T 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 158.9 mm | 162 mm | −3.1 mm |
| Width | 73.6 mm | 77.3 mm | −3.7 mm |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 9.1 mm | −0.7 mm |
| Weight | 184 g | 199 g | −15 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A32 better than Redmi Note 9T 5G?
- RAM8 GB vs 4 GB2×
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 60 Hz+50%
- OLED panelYes · Redmi Note 9T 5G: No
- Main camera64 MP vs 48 MP+33%
- Peak brightness800 nits vs 450 nits+78%
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Redmi Note 9T 5G: No
- Weight184 g vs 199 g+8%
- Pixel density411 ppi vs 395 ppi+4%
- Selfie camera20 MP vs 13 MP+54%
- Thickness8.4 mm vs 9.1 mm+8%
Why is Redmi Note 9T 5G better than Galaxy A32?
- 5GNo · Galaxy A32: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · Galaxy A32: Yes
- Wired charging15 W vs 18 W+20%
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- CPU frequency2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+20%
- Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 184 g | 199 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 9.1 mm |
| Height | 158.9 mm | 162 mm |
| Width | 73.6 mm | 77.3 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Blue, Awesome Violet | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.4″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 411 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 800 nits | 450 nits |
| Measured brightness | 814 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.6% | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 | Mediatek Dimensity 800U |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Mediatek |
| Process | 12 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali G57 MC3 |
| AnTuTu score | 286,666 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,277 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | — |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | — |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 20 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 15 W | 18 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 25% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | — |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | — |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -30.3 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | proximity, accelerometer, gyro, light, barometer |
| SAR (head) | 0.45 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 5 | Miui V12 |
