- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy A32 vs Redmi Note 9
Samsung Galaxy A32 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
What Galaxy A32 does better (11) and where Redmi Note 9 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.9Display3.6
2.6Performance2.2
7.1Camera5.7
4.0Battery5.8
5.0Features5.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A32Redmi Note 9
| Galaxy A32 | Redmi Note 9 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 158.9 mm | 162.3 mm | −3.4 mm |
| Width | 73.6 mm | 77.2 mm | −3.6 mm |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 8.9 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Weight | 184 g | 199 g | −15 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A32 better than Redmi Note 9?
- AnTuTu score286,666 vs 200,414+43%
- Measured brightness814 nits vs 370 nits2.2×
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 60 Hz+50%
- OLED panelYes · Redmi Note 9: No
- RAM8 GB vs 6 GB+33%
- Main camera64 MP vs 48 MP+33%
- Peak brightness800 nits vs 450 nits+78%
- Weight184 g vs 199 g+8%
- Pixel density411 ppi vs 395 ppi+4%
- Selfie camera20 MP vs 13 MP+54%
- Thickness8.4 mm vs 8.9 mm+6%
Why is Redmi Note 9 better than Galaxy A32?
- Wired charging15 W vs 18 W+20%
- Charged in 30 min25% vs 38%+52%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 184 g | 199 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 8.9 mm |
| Height | 158.9 mm | 162.3 mm |
| Width | 73.6 mm | 77.2 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Blue, Awesome Violet | Forest Green, Midnight Grey, Polar White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.4″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 411 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 800 nits | 450 nits |
| Measured brightness | 814 nits | 370 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.6% | 83.5% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 286,666 | 200,414 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,277 | 1,292 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 20 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,020 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 15 W | 18 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 25% | 38% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -30.3 LUFS | -30.1 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Rear |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.45 W/kg | 0.8 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 5 | MIUI 13 |
