- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy A32 vs Poco M3 Pro 5G
Samsung Galaxy A32 vs Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
What Galaxy A32 does better (10) and where Poco M3 Pro 5G wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.9Display4.9
2.6Performance3.7
7.1Camera3.9
4.0Battery4.6
5.0Features7.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A32Poco M3 Pro 5G
| Galaxy A32 | Poco M3 Pro 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 158.9 mm | 161.8 mm | −2.9 mm |
| Width | 73.6 mm | 75.3 mm | −1.7 mm |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 8.9 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Weight | 184 g | 190 g | −6 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A32 better than Poco M3 Pro 5G?
- OLED panelYes · Poco M3 Pro 5G: No
- RAM8 GB vs 6 GB+33%
- Main camera64 MP vs 48 MP+33%
- Peak brightness800 nits vs 500 nits+60%
- Measured brightness814 nits vs 536 nits+52%
- Selfie camera20 MP vs 8 MP2.5×
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Poco M3 Pro 5G: No
- Weight184 g vs 190 g+3%
- Thickness8.4 mm vs 8.9 mm+6%
Why is Poco M3 Pro 5G better than Galaxy A32?
- AnTuTu score286,666 vs 533,942+86%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,277 vs 1,916+50%
- 5GNo · Galaxy A32: Yes
- Wired charging15 W vs 18 W+20%
- CPU frequency2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+10%
- Process12 nm vs 7 nm+71%
- Charged in 30 min25% vs 33%+32%
- Loudspeaker loudness-30.3 LUFS vs -27.9 LUFS+-8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 184 g | 190 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 8.9 mm |
| Height | 158.9 mm | 161.8 mm |
| Width | 73.6 mm | 75.3 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Blue, Awesome Violet | Poco Yellow, Power Black, Cool Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.4″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 411 ppi | 405 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 800 nits | 500 nits |
| Measured brightness | 814 nits | 536 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.6% | 83.7% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 | Mediatek Dimensity 700 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 286,666 | 533,942 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,277 | 1,916 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 321 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 20 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 15 W | 18 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 25% | 33% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -30.3 LUFS | -27.9 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.45 W/kg | 0.54 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 5 | MIUI 12 |
