How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Galaxy A22 vs Bison Pro

Samsung Galaxy A22 vs Umidigi Bison Pro

What Galaxy A22 does better (7) and where Bison Pro wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Samsung Galaxy A22
Samsung · 2021Galaxy A22
6.0Score
7 advantages≈ $240
Higher score
vs
Umidigi Bison Pro
Umidigi · 2021Bison Pro
6.0Score
6 advantages
5.8Display4.1
7.4Camera6.3
4.0Battery4.6
5.0Features6.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

Galaxy A22Bison Pro
73.6 × 159.38.479.6 × 16412.7
Galaxy A22Bison ProDifference
Height159.3 mm164 mm−4.7 mm
Width73.6 mm79.6 mm−6 mm
Thickness8.4 mm12.7 mm−4.3 mm
Weight186 g265 g−79 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Galaxy A22 better than Bison Pro?

  1. Refresh rate90 Hz vs 60 Hz+50%
  2. OLED panelYes · Bison Pro: No
  3. Optical stabilisationYes · Bison Pro: No
  4. Weight186 g vs 265 g+42%
  5. Thickness8.4 mm vs 12.7 mm+51%
  6. Bluetooth5 vs 4.2+19%
  7. Screen-to-body ratio84.3% vs 74.6%+13%

Why is Bison Pro better than Galaxy A22?

  1. RAM6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
  2. Wired charging15 W vs 18 W+20%
  3. Pixel density274 ppi vs 409 ppi+49%
  4. Storage (base)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
  5. Selfie camera13 MP vs 24 MP+85%
  6. Resolution (width)720 px vs 1,080 px+50%
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight186 g265 g
Thickness8.4 mm12.7 mm
Height159.3 mm164 mm
Width73.6 mm79.6 mm
FramePlastic—
BackPlastic—
Ingress protection—IP68
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx8
Glass protectionGorilla Glass 5Corning Gorilla Glass
ColoursBlack, White, Mint, VioletStorm Gray, Hack Black
Display
Screen size6.4″6.3″
PanelSuper AMOLEDIPS LCD
OLED panelYesNo
Resolution (width)720 px1,080 px
Resolution (height)1,600 px2,340 px
Pixel density274 ppi409 ppi
Refresh rate90 Hz60 Hz
Peak brightness600 nits—
Measured brightness597 nits—
Screen-to-body ratio84.3%74.6%
Performance
ChipsetMediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80Mediatek Helio G80
Chip makerMediaTekMediaTek
Process12 nm12 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency2 GHz2 GHz
GPUMali-G52 MC2Mali-G52 MC2
AnTuTu score185,358—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)5,464—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme173—
Memory
RAM6 GB8 GB
Storage (max)128 GB128 GB
Storage (base)64 GB128 GB
Storage typeeMMC 5.1—
Memory card slotYesYes
Camera
Main camera48 MP48 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.8f/1.8
Main sensor size1/2.0"1/2.0"
Rear cameras22
Optical stabilisationYesNo
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraNoNo
Max video1080p1080p
Selfie camera13 MP24 MP
4K selfie videoNoNo
Battery
Battery capacity5,000 mAh5,000 mAh
Battery typeLi-Po—
Wired charging15 W18 W
Charged in 30 min23%—
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
5GNoNo
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth54.2
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C
USB version2—
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDSGLONASS, GALILEO
Features
Stereo speakersNoNo
3.5 mm headphone jackYesYes
Loudspeaker loudness-30.6 LUFS—
Fingerprint sensorSideSide
Barometer—Yes
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compassFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass, barometer, thermometer (skin temperature)
SAR (head)0.52 W/kg—
Software
OS at launchAndroid 11Android 11
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceOne UI 5—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare