- android.gs
- Compare
- Note 11 Pro vs Galaxy A22
Infinix Note 11 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy A22
What Note 11 Pro does better (14) and where Galaxy A22 wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.2Display5.8
3.0Performance3.5
6.8Camera7.4
6.0Battery4.0
3.5Features5.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Note 11 ProGalaxy A22
| Note 11 Pro | Galaxy A22 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 173.1 mm | 159.3 mm | +13.8 mm |
| Width | 78.4 mm | 73.6 mm | +4.8 mm |
| Thickness | 8.7 mm | 8.4 mm | +0.3 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Note 11 Pro better than Galaxy A22?
- Wired charging33 W vs 15 W2.2×
- AnTuTu score290,797 vs 185,358+57%
- Telephoto cameraYes · Galaxy A22: No
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 90 Hz+33%
- RAM8 GB vs 6 GB+33%
- Main camera64 MP vs 48 MP+33%
- Pixel density387 ppi vs 274 ppi+41%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Screen size7″ vs 6.4″+9%
- CPU frequency2.05 GHz vs 2 GHz+2%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 720 px+50%
- Loudspeaker loudness-23 LUFS vs -30.6 LUFS+-25%
Why is Galaxy A22 better than Note 11 Pro?
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,800 vs 5,4643×
- OLED panelNo · Note 11 Pro: Yes
- Optical stabilisationNo · Note 11 Pro: Yes
- NFCNo · Note 11 Pro: Yes
- Measured brightness470 nits vs 597 nits+27%
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Note 11 Pro: Yes
- Thickness8.7 mm vs 8.4 mm+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | — | 186 g |
| Thickness | 8.7 mm | 8.4 mm |
| Height | 173.1 mm | 159.3 mm |
| Width | 78.4 mm | 73.6 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Glass protection | — | Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Mithril Grey, Haze Green, Mist Blue | Black, White, Mint, Violet |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 7″ | 6.4″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,460 px | 1,600 px |
| Pixel density | 387 ppi | 274 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 600 nits |
| Measured brightness | 470 nits | 597 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.5% | 84.3% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 | Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.05 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 290,797 | 185,358 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,800 | 5,464 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 173 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.72" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 2× | — |
| Max video | — | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 15 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 23% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -23 LUFS | -30.6 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.52 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | XOS 10 | One UI 5 |
