How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Galaxy A22 5G vs Bison Pro

Samsung Galaxy A22 5G vs Umidigi Bison Pro

What Galaxy A22 5G does better (9) and where Bison Pro wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Samsung · 2021Galaxy A22 5G
5.9Score
9 advantages≈ $170
vs
Umidigi Bison Pro
Umidigi · 2021Bison Pro
6.0Score
4 advantages
Higher score
4.3Display4.1
5.3Camera6.3
4.0Battery4.6
7.1Features6.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

Galaxy A22 5GBison Pro
76.4 × 167.2979.6 × 16412.7
Galaxy A22 5GBison ProDifference
Height167.2 mm164 mm+3.2 mm
Width76.4 mm79.6 mm−3.2 mm
Thickness9 mm12.7 mm−3.7 mm
Weight203 g265 g−62 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Galaxy A22 5G better than Bison Pro?

  1. Refresh rate90 Hz vs 60 Hz+50%
  2. 5GYes · Bison Pro: No
  3. Weight203 g vs 265 g+31%
  4. CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz+10%
  5. Process7 nm vs 12 nm+71%
  6. Screen size6.6″ vs 6.3″+5%
  7. Thickness9 mm vs 12.7 mm+41%
  8. Bluetooth5 vs 4.2+19%
  9. Screen-to-body ratio82.3% vs 74.6%+10%

Why is Bison Pro better than Galaxy A22 5G?

  1. Wired charging15 W vs 18 W+20%
  2. Selfie camera8 MP vs 24 MP3×
  3. Storage (base)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
  4. Pixel density399 ppi vs 409 ppi+3%
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight203 g265 g
Thickness9 mm12.7 mm
Height167.2 mm164 mm
Width76.4 mm79.6 mm
FramePlastic—
BackPlastic—
Ingress protection—IP68
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx8
Glass protection—Corning Gorilla Glass
ColoursGray, White, Mint, VioletStorm Gray, Hack Black
Display
Screen size6.6″6.3″
PanelTFT LCDIPS LCD
OLED panelNoNo
Resolution (width)1,080 px1,080 px
Resolution (height)2,400 px2,340 px
Pixel density399 ppi409 ppi
Refresh rate90 Hz60 Hz
Peak brightness380 nits—
Measured brightness385 nits—
Screen-to-body ratio82.3%74.6%
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 700Mediatek Helio G80
Chip makerMediaTekMediaTek
Process7 nm12 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency2.2 GHz2 GHz
GPUMali-G57 MC2Mali-G52 MC2
AnTuTu score242,155—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,913—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme320—
Memory
RAM8 GB8 GB
Storage (max)128 GB128 GB
Storage (base)64 GB128 GB
Storage typeeMMC 5.1—
Memory card slotYesYes
Camera
Main camera48 MP48 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.8f/1.8
Main sensor size1/2"1/2.0"
Rear cameras22
Optical stabilisationNoNo
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraNoNo
Max video1080p1080p
Selfie camera8 MP24 MP
4K selfie videoNoNo
Battery
Battery capacity5,000 mAh5,000 mAh
Battery typeLi-Po—
Wired charging15 W18 W
Charged in 30 min23%—
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
5GYesNo
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth54.2
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C
USB version2—
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDSGLONASS, GALILEO
Features
Stereo speakersNoNo
3.5 mm headphone jackYesYes
Loudspeaker loudness-28.5 LUFS—
Fingerprint sensorSideSide
Barometer—Yes
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass, barometer, thermometer (skin temperature)
SAR (head)0.73 W/kg—
Software
OS at launchAndroid 11Android 11
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceOne UI core 5—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare