- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy A22 5G vs Camon 17
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G vs Tecno Camon 17
What Galaxy A22 5G does better (10) and where Camon 17 wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.3Display3.9
5.3Camera5.0
4.0Battery4.6
7.1Features2.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A22 5GCamon 17
| Galaxy A22 5G | Camon 17 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 167.2 mm | 164.5 mm | +2.7 mm |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 76.5 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Thickness | 9 mm | 9 mm | = |
| Weight | 203 g | 197 g | +6 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A22 5G better than Camon 17?
- 5GYes · Camon 17: No
- NFCYes · Camon 17: No
- RAM8 GB vs 6 GB+33%
- Pixel density399 ppi vs 266 ppi+50%
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Camon 17: No
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz+10%
- Process7 nm vs 12 nm+71%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 720 px+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 4+25%
Why is Camon 17 better than Galaxy A22 5G?
- Wired charging15 W vs 18 W+20%
- Storage (base)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 16 MP2×
- Peak brightness380 nits vs 450 nits+18%
- Weight203 g vs 197 g+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 203 g | 197 g |
| Thickness | 9 mm | 9 mm |
| Height | 167.2 mm | 164.5 mm |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 76.5 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Colours | Gray, White, Mint, Violet | Frost Sliver, Deep Sea, Tranquil Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | TFT LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 1,600 px |
| Pixel density | 399 ppi | 266 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 380 nits | 450 nits |
| Measured brightness | 385 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.3% | 83.6% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 242,155 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 6,913 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 320 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/2" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 15 W | 18 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 23% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | — |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | Yes |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -28.5 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Rear |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| SAR (head) | 0.73 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI core 5 | — |
