- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy A17 4G vs Blade V70 Max
Samsung Galaxy A17 4G vs ZTE Blade V70 Max
What Galaxy A17 4G does better (14) and where Blade V70 Max wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.0Display6.6
7.8Camera4.6
5.3Battery7.4
5.7Features4.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A17 4GBlade V70 Max
| Galaxy A17 4G | Blade V70 Max | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.4 mm | 171.8 mm | −7.4 mm |
| Width | 77.9 mm | 78.4 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 8.3 mm | −0.8 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A17 4G better than Blade V70 Max?
- OLED panelYes · Blade V70 Max: No
- Optical stabilisationYes · Blade V70 Max: No
- Pixel density385 ppi vs 260 ppi+48%
- Wired charging25 W vs 22 W+11%
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 1.6 GHz+38%
- Process6 nm vs 12 nm2×
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Blade V70 Max: No
- Energy classA vs B
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 8 MP+62%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 720 px+50%
- Battery charge cycles1,200 vs 800+50%
Why is Blade V70 Max better than Galaxy A17 4G?
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+20%
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Galaxy A17 4G: Yes
- Repairability classC vs B
- Screen size6.7″ vs 6.9″+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 190 g | — |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 8.3 mm |
| Height | 164.4 mm | 171.8 mm |
| Width | 77.9 mm | 78.4 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ | — |
| Colours | Black, Gray, Light blue | Purple, Green, Pink |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 1,640 px |
| Pixel density | 385 ppi | 260 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 800 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86% | 83.9% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 | Unisoc T7200 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Unisoc |
| Process | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| AnTuTu score | 526,972 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,052 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | — |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 22 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 44% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| SAR (head) | 0.37 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 7 | — |
| Major OS updates promised | 6 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | A | B |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,200 | 800 |
| Endurance per cycle | 52 h | 52 h |
| Repairability class | C | B |
| Drop resistance class | B | B |
