android.gs
Compare
Hot 60 Pro+ vs Galaxy A17 4G

Infinix Hot 60 Pro+ vs Samsung Galaxy A17 4G

What Hot 60 Pro+ does better (12) and where Galaxy A17 4G wins (7) — every spec side by side.

Infinix · 2025Hot 60 Pro+

7.2Score

12 advantages

Higher score

Samsung · 2025Galaxy A17 4G

7.0Score

7 advantages≈ $170

9.8Display7.0

3.9Performance4.3

5.2Camera7.8

5.5Battery5.3

5.7Features5.7

Dimensions

Size comparison

Hot 60 Pro+Galaxy A17 4G

	Hot 60 Pro+	Galaxy A17 4G	Difference
Height	164 mm	164.4 mm	−0.4 mm
Width	75.8 mm	77.9 mm	−2.1 mm
Thickness	6 mm	7.5 mm	−1.5 mm
Weight	155 g	190 g	−35 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Hot 60 Pro+ better than Galaxy A17 4G?

Peak brightness4,500 nits vs 800 nits5.6×
Wired charging45 W vs 25 W+80%
Refresh rate144 Hz vs 90 Hz+60%
Stereo speakersYes · Galaxy A17 4G: No
Battery capacity5,160 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+3%
Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx4+25%
Weight155 g vs 190 g+23%
Pixel density440 ppi vs 385 ppi+14%
Charged in 30 min68% vs 44%+55%
Thickness6 mm vs 7.5 mm+25%
Resolution (width)1,224 px vs 1,080 px+13%
Screen-to-body ratio89.3% vs 86%+4%

Why is Galaxy A17 4G better than Hot 60 Pro+?

Optical stabilisationNo · Hot 60 Pro+: Yes
Major OS updates promised3 vs 62×
AnTuTu score446,336 vs 526,972+18%
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,945 vs 2,052+6%
Memory card slotNo · Hot 60 Pro+: Yes
Rear cameras1 vs 22×
Ultra-wide cameraNo · Hot 60 Pro+: Yes

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Infinix Hot 60 Pro+7.2	Samsung Galaxy A17 4G≈ $1707.0
Design
Weight	155 g	190 g
Thickness	6 mm	7.5 mm
Height	164 mm	164.4 mm
Width	75.8 mm	77.9 mm
Frame	Plastic	Plastic
Back	Plastic	Plastic
Ingress protection	IP65	IP54
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx5	IPx4
Glass protection	Corning Gorilla Glass 7i	Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+
Colours	Sleek Black, Titanium Silver, Coral Tides, Misty Violet, Sonic Yellow, Moco Cyber Green	Black, Gray, Light blue
Display
Screen size	6.8″	6.7″
Panel	AMOLED	Super AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,224 px	1,080 px
Resolution (height)	2,720 px	2,340 px
Pixel density	440 ppi	385 ppi
Refresh rate	144 Hz	90 Hz
Peak brightness	4,500 nits	800 nits
Measured brightness	1,650 nits	—
Screen-to-body ratio	89.3%	86%
Performance
Chipset	Mediatek Helio G200	Mediatek Helio G99
Chip maker	MediaTek	MediaTek
Process	6 nm	6 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.2 GHz	2.2 GHz
GPU	Mali-G57 MC2	Mali-G57 MC2
AnTuTu score	446,336	526,972
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	1,945	2,052
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	380	—
Memory
RAM	8 GB	8 GB
Storage (max)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage (base)	128 GB	128 GB
Storage type	UFS 2.2	—
Memory card slot	No	Yes
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.8
Main sensor size	1/1.95"	1/2.76"
Rear cameras	1	2
Optical stabilisation	No	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	No	Yes
Telephoto camera	No	No
Max video	1080p	1080p
Selfie camera	13 MP	13 MP
4K selfie video	No	No
Battery
Battery capacity	5,160 mAh	5,000 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Ion
Active use (test)	11.2 h	—
Wired charging	45 W	25 W
Charged in 30 min	68%	44%
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
5G	No	No
eSIM	No	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 5	Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth	5.4	5.3
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	2	2
Infrared port	Yes	—
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	No
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	-25.1 LUFS	—
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	Side
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass
SAR (head)	—	0.37 W/kg
Software
OS at launch	Android 15	Android 15
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	XOS 15.1	One UI 7
Major OS updates promised	3	6
EU label
Energy class	—	A
Battery charge cycles	—	1,200
Endurance per cycle	—	52 h
Repairability class	—	C
Drop resistance class	—	B