- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy A17 4G vs Poco C71
Samsung Galaxy A17 4G vs Xiaomi Poco C71
What Galaxy A17 4G does better (23) and where Poco C71 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.0Display5.9
4.3Performance2.4
7.8Camera3.8
5.3Battery5.8
5.7Features2.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A17 4GPoco C71
| Galaxy A17 4G | Poco C71 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.4 mm | 171.8 mm | −7.4 mm |
| Width | 77.9 mm | 77.8 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 8.3 mm | −0.8 mm |
| Weight | 190 g | 193 g | −3 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A17 4G better than Poco C71?
- AnTuTu score526,972 vs 322,517+63%
- Major OS updates promised6 vs 23×
- Wired charging25 W vs 15 W+67%
- Main camera50 MP vs 32 MP+56%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx22×
- OLED panelYes · Poco C71: No
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationYes · Poco C71: No
- NFCYes · Poco C71: No
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,052 vs 1,438+43%
- RAM8 GB vs 6 GB+33%
- Pixel density385 ppi vs 260 ppi+48%
Why is Poco C71 better than Galaxy A17 4G?
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 5,200 mAh+4%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Galaxy A17 4G: Yes
- Screen size6.7″ vs 6.9″+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 190 g | 193 g |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 8.3 mm |
| Height | 164.4 mm | 171.8 mm |
| Width | 77.9 mm | 77.8 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | IP52 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx2 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ | — |
| Colours | Black, Gray, Light blue | Power Black, Cool Blue, Desert Gold |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 1,640 px |
| Pixel density | 385 ppi | 260 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 800 nits | 600 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86% | 84.1% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 | Unisoc T7250 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Unisoc |
| Process | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| AnTuTu score | 526,972 | 322,517 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,052 | 1,438 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | — | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 32 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,200 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 15 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 44% | 24% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.37 W/kg | 0.82 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 or Android 15 (Go edition) |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 7 | Android Go |
| Major OS updates promised | 6 | 2 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | A | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,200 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 52 h | — |
| Repairability class | C | — |
| Drop resistance class | B | — |
