- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy A17 4G vs Y29 4G
Samsung Galaxy A17 4G vs Vivo Y29 4G
What Galaxy A17 4G does better (11) and where Y29 4G wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.0Display6.2
7.8Camera4.6
5.3Battery8.4
5.7Features5.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A17 4GY29 4G
| Galaxy A17 4G | Y29 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.4 mm | 165.7 mm | −1.3 mm |
| Width | 77.9 mm | 76.3 mm | +1.6 mm |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 8.2 mm | −0.7 mm |
| Weight | 190 g | 204 g | −14 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A17 4G better than Y29 4G?
- OLED panelYes · Y29 4G: No
- Optical stabilisationYes · Y29 4G: No
- Pixel density385 ppi vs 264 ppi+46%
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Y29 4G: No
- Weight190 g vs 204 g+7%
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 8 MP+62%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 720 px+50%
- Charged in 30 min44% vs 37%+19%
- Thickness7.5 mm vs 8.2 mm+9%
- Bluetooth5.3 vs 5+6%
Why is Y29 4G better than Galaxy A17 4G?
- Wired charging25 W vs 44 W+76%
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 6,500 mAh+30%
- Stereo speakersNo · Galaxy A17 4G: Yes
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.8 GHz+27%
- Peak brightness800 nits vs 1,000 nits+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 190 g | 204 g |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 164.4 mm | 165.7 mm |
| Width | 77.9 mm | 76.3 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ | Schott Glass |
| Colours | Black, Gray, Light blue | Noble Brown, Elegant White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 1,608 px |
| Pixel density | 385 ppi | 264 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 800 nits | 1,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86% | 84.9% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 610 |
| AnTuTu score | 526,972 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,052 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 44 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 44% | 37% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.37 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 7 | Funtouch 16 |
| Major OS updates promised | 6 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | A | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,200 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 52 h | — |
| Repairability class | C | — |
| Drop resistance class | B | — |
