- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy A17 4G vs RugKing 4 Pro
Samsung Galaxy A17 4G vs UleFone RugKing 4 Pro
What Galaxy A17 4G does better (16) and where RugKing 4 Pro wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.0Display5.2
7.8Camera3.9
5.3Battery7.9
5.7Features6.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A17 4GRugKing 4 Pro
| Galaxy A17 4G | RugKing 4 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.4 mm | 178.6 mm | −14.2 mm |
| Width | 77.9 mm | 84 mm | −6.1 mm |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 19.2 mm | −11.7 mm |
| Weight | 190 g | 405 g | −215 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A17 4G better than RugKing 4 Pro?
- Weight190 g vs 405 g2.1×
- OLED panelYes · RugKing 4 Pro: No
- Optical stabilisationYes · RugKing 4 Pro: No
- Wired charging25 W vs 18 W+39%
- Peak brightness800 nits vs 500 nits+60%
- Thickness7.5 mm vs 19.2 mm2.6×
- Pixel density385 ppi vs 269 ppi+43%
- Main camera50 MP vs 48 MP+4%
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 1.8 GHz+22%
- Process6 nm vs 12 nm2×
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · RugKing 4 Pro: No
Why is RugKing 4 Pro better than Galaxy A17 4G?
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 10,200 mAh2×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx82×
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 190 g | 405 g |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 19.2 mm |
| Height | 164.4 mm | 178.6 mm |
| Width | 77.9 mm | 84 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | Black, Gray, Light blue | Black, Orange |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 1,612 px |
| Pixel density | 385 ppi | 269 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 800 nits | 500 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86% | 68.9% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 | Unisoc T7250 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Unisoc |
| Process | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| AnTuTu score | 526,972 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,052 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 10,200 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 18 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 44% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse wireless charging | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.37 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 7 | — |
| Major OS updates promised | 6 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | A | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,200 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 52 h | — |
| Repairability class | C | — |
| Drop resistance class | B | — |
