- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy A12 vs Redmi Note 9 Pro
Samsung Galaxy A12 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
What Galaxy A12 does better (1) and where Redmi Note 9 Pro wins (18) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.6Display4.2
2.2Performance3.2
5.3Camera7.2
4.0Battery6.8
4.3Features5.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A12Redmi Note 9 Pro
| Galaxy A12 | Redmi Note 9 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164 mm | 165.8 mm | −1.8 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 76.7 mm | −0.9 mm |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 8.8 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 205 g | 209 g | −4 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A12 better than Redmi Note 9 Pro?
- CPU frequency2.35 GHz vs 2.3 GHz+2%
Why is Redmi Note 9 Pro better than Galaxy A12?
- AnTuTu score107,189 vs 279,6252.6×
- Wired charging15 W vs 30 W2×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,034 vs 1,785+73%
- RAM6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
- Main camera48 MP vs 64 MP+33%
- Pixel density270 ppi vs 395 ppi+46%
- Charged in 30 min20% vs 50%2.5×
- Measured brightness472 nits vs 614 nits+30%
- Storage (base)32 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 16 MP2×
- Screen size6.5″ vs 6.7″+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 205 g | 209 g |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 8.8 mm |
| Height | 164 mm | 165.8 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 76.7 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Glass |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Black, White, Blue, Red | Tropical Green, Glacier White, Interstellar Gray |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | PLS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,600 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 270 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 450 nits | 450 nits |
| Measured brightness | 472 nits | 614 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.1% | 84.5% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.35 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Adreno 618 |
| AnTuTu score | 107,189 | 279,625 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,034 | 1,785 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 315 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 32 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/2 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2" | 1/1.72" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,020 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 15 W | 30 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 20% | 50% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -30.4 LUFS | -28.6 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.67 W/kg | 0.66 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 4.1 | MIUI 11 |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy A12vsSamsung Galaxy A324.45.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy A52vsSamsung Galaxy A126.94.4
vs
Samsung Galaxy A12vsSamsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G4.49.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy A72vsSamsung Galaxy A127.44.4
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 ProvsSamsung Galaxy A126.94.4
vs
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5GvsSamsung Galaxy A129.04.4

