- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy A12 vs Galaxy A32
Samsung Galaxy A12 vs Samsung Galaxy A32
What Galaxy A12 does better (1) and where Galaxy A32 wins (18) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.6Display6.9
2.2Performance2.6
5.3Camera7.1
4.0Battery4.0
4.3Features5.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A12Galaxy A32
| Galaxy A12 | Galaxy A32 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164 mm | 158.9 mm | +5.1 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 73.6 mm | +2.2 mm |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 8.4 mm | +0.5 mm |
| Weight | 205 g | 184 g | +21 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A12 better than Galaxy A32?
- CPU frequency2.35 GHz vs 2 GHz+18%
Why is Galaxy A32 better than Galaxy A12?
- AnTuTu score107,189 vs 286,6662.7×
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 90 Hz+50%
- OLED panelNo · Galaxy A12: Yes
- RAM6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
- Main camera48 MP vs 64 MP+33%
- Peak brightness450 nits vs 800 nits+78%
- Measured brightness472 nits vs 814 nits+72%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,034 vs 1,277+24%
- Pixel density270 ppi vs 411 ppi+52%
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 20 MP2.5×
- Storage (base)32 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Weight205 g vs 184 g+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 205 g | 184 g |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 8.4 mm |
| Height | 164 mm | 158.9 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 73.6 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Black, White, Blue, Red | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Blue, Awesome Violet |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.4″ |
| Panel | PLS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,600 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 270 ppi | 411 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 450 nits | 800 nits |
| Measured brightness | 472 nits | 814 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.1% | 84.6% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 | Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.35 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 107,189 | 286,666 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,034 | 1,277 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 32 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/2 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 15 W | 15 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 20% | 25% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -30.4 LUFS | -30.3 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.67 W/kg | 0.45 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 4.1 | One UI 5 |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy A52vsSamsung Galaxy A126.94.4
vs
Samsung Galaxy A12vsSamsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G4.49.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy A72vsSamsung Galaxy A127.44.4
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 ProvsSamsung Galaxy A126.94.4
vs
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5GvsSamsung Galaxy A129.04.4
vs
Samsung Galaxy S23 UltravsSamsung Galaxy A129.24.4

