- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy A12 vs Redmi Note 9
Samsung Galaxy A12 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 9
What Galaxy A12 does better (2) and where Redmi Note 9 wins (11) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.6Display3.6
2.2Performance2.2
5.3Camera5.7
4.0Battery5.8
4.3Features5.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A12Redmi Note 9
| Galaxy A12 | Redmi Note 9 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164 mm | 162.3 mm | +1.7 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 77.2 mm | −1.4 mm |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 8.9 mm | = |
| Weight | 205 g | 199 g | +6 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A12 better than Redmi Note 9?
- Measured brightness472 nits vs 370 nits+28%
- CPU frequency2.35 GHz vs 2 GHz+18%
Why is Redmi Note 9 better than Galaxy A12?
- AnTuTu score107,189 vs 200,414+87%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,034 vs 1,292+25%
- Wired charging15 W vs 18 W+20%
- Pixel density270 ppi vs 395 ppi+46%
- Storage (base)32 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Charged in 30 min20% vs 38%+90%
- Weight205 g vs 199 g+3%
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 13 MP+62%
- Resolution (width)720 px vs 1,080 px+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 4 vs Wi-Fi 5+25%
- Main camera aperturef/2 vs f/1.8+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 205 g | 199 g |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 8.9 mm |
| Height | 164 mm | 162.3 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 77.2 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Black, White, Blue, Red | Forest Green, Midnight Grey, Polar White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | PLS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,600 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 270 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 450 nits | 450 nits |
| Measured brightness | 472 nits | 370 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.1% | 83.5% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.35 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 107,189 | 200,414 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,034 | 1,292 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 32 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/2 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,020 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 15 W | 18 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 20% | 38% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -30.4 LUFS | -30.1 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Rear |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.67 W/kg | 0.8 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 4.1 | MIUI 13 |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy A12vsSamsung Galaxy A324.45.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy A52vsSamsung Galaxy A126.94.4
vs
Samsung Galaxy A12vsSamsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G4.49.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy A72vsSamsung Galaxy A127.44.4
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 ProvsSamsung Galaxy A126.94.4
vs
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5GvsSamsung Galaxy A129.04.4

