- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy A12 vs Pop 4
Samsung Galaxy A12 vs Tecno Pop 4
What Galaxy A12 does better (14) and where Pop 4 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.6Display2.3
5.3Camera3.0
4.0Battery5.6
4.3Features2.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A12Pop 4
| Galaxy A12 | Pop 4 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164 mm | 160 mm | +4 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 77.3 mm | −1.5 mm |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 9.5 mm | −0.6 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A12 better than Pop 4?
- RAM6 GB vs 2 GB3×
- Main camera48 MP vs 5 MP9.6×
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 32 GB4×
- NFCYes · Pop 4: No
- CPU frequency2.35 GHz vs 1.3 GHz+81%
- Pixel density270 ppi vs 179 ppi+51%
- CPU cores8 vs 42×
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Pop 4: No
- Screen size6.5″ vs 6″+8%
- Resolution (width)720 px vs 480 px+50%
- Bluetooth5 vs 4.2+19%
Why is Pop 4 better than Galaxy A12?
Pop 4 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 205 g | — |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 9.5 mm |
| Height | 164 mm | 160 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 77.3 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colours | Black, White, Blue, Red | Ice Lake Green, Dawn Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6″ |
| Panel | PLS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 480 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,600 px | 960 px |
| Pixel density | 270 ppi | 179 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 450 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 472 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.1% | 75.1% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 | MediaTek |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 12 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 8 | 4 |
| CPU frequency | 2.35 GHz | 1.3 GHz |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | — |
| AnTuTu score | 107,189 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,034 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 2 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 32 GB |
| Storage (base) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 5 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/2 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/2" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 15 W | — |
| Charged in 30 min | 20% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 4.2 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -30.4 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Rear |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| SAR (head) | 0.67 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 10 (Go edition) |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 4.1 | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy A12vsSamsung Galaxy A324.45.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy A52vsSamsung Galaxy A126.94.4
vs
Samsung Galaxy A12vsSamsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G4.49.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy A72vsSamsung Galaxy A127.44.4
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 ProvsSamsung Galaxy A126.94.4
vs
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5GvsSamsung Galaxy A129.04.4

