- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy A12 vs Galaxy S25 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy A12 vs Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
What Galaxy A12 does better (3) and where Galaxy S25 Ultra wins (34) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.6Display9.1
2.2Performance9.1
5.3Camera9.8
4.0Battery7.1
4.3Features9.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A12Galaxy S25 Ultra
| Galaxy A12 | Galaxy S25 Ultra | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164 mm | 162.8 mm | +1.2 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 77.6 mm | −1.8 mm |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 8.2 mm | +0.7 mm |
| Weight | 205 g | 218 g | −13 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A12 better than Galaxy S25 Ultra?
- Memory card slotYes · Galaxy S25 Ultra: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Galaxy S25 Ultra: No
- Weight205 g vs 218 g+6%
Why is Galaxy S25 Ultra better than Galaxy A12?
- AnTuTu score107,189 vs 2,207,80920.6×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,034 vs 9,8469.5×
- RAM6 GB vs 16 GB2.7×
- Main camera48 MP vs 200 MP4.2×
- Wired charging15 W vs 45 W3×
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
- Peak brightness450 nits vs 2,600 nits5.8×
- Measured brightness472 nits vs 1,417 nits3×
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 1,024 GB8×
- OLED panelNo · Galaxy A12: Yes
- Optical stabilisationNo · Galaxy A12: Yes
- Telephoto cameraNo · Galaxy A12: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 205 g | 218 g |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 164 mm | 162.8 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 77.6 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Titanium |
| Back | Plastic | Glass |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Armor 2 |
| Colours | Black, White, Blue, Red | Titanium Silver Blue, Titanium Black, Titanium White Silver, Titanium Gray, Titanium Jade Green, Titanium Jet Black, Titanium Pink Gold |
| Stylus | — | Yes |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | PLS LCD | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,440 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,600 px | 3,120 px |
| Pixel density | 270 ppi | 498 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 450 nits | 2,600 nits |
| Measured brightness | 472 nits | 1,417 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.1% | 92.5% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 | Qualcomm SM8750-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 12 nm | 3 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.35 GHz | 4.47 GHz |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Adreno 830 |
| AnTuTu score | 107,189 | 2,207,809 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,034 | 9,846 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 6,687 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 32 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 200 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/2 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2" | 1/1.3" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 4 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 5× |
| Max video | 1080p | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 120 fps |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 12 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Active use (test) | — | 14.8 h |
| Wired charging | 15 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 20% | 65% |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | — | 15 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| Video output | — | Yes |
| Ultra Wideband | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -30.4 LUFS | -24.6 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display, ultrasonic |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| SAR (head) | 0.67 W/kg | 1.25 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 4.1 | One UI 9 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 7 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | B |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 2,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 45 h |
| Repairability class | — | C |
| Drop resistance class | — | A |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy A12vsSamsung Galaxy A324.45.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy A52vsSamsung Galaxy A126.94.4
vs
Samsung Galaxy A12vsSamsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G4.49.2
vs
Samsung Galaxy A72vsSamsung Galaxy A127.44.4
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 ProvsSamsung Galaxy A126.94.4
vs
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5GvsSamsung Galaxy A129.04.4

