- android.gs
- Compare
- Narzo 80 Pro vs T4
Realme Narzo 80 Pro vs Vivo T4
What Narzo 80 Pro does better (7) and where T4 wins (8) — every spec side by side.
8.7Display8.8
7.0Performance7.1
7.5Camera7.8
8.9Battery9.5
6.7Features4.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Narzo 80 ProT4
| Narzo 80 Pro | T4 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.8 mm | 163.4 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Width | 74.9 mm | 76.4 mm | −1.5 mm |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 7.9 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Weight | 179 g | 199 g | −20 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Narzo 80 Pro better than T4?
- Stereo speakersYes · T4: No
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx5+60%
- Weight179 g vs 199 g+11%
- CPU frequency2.6 GHz vs 2.5 GHz+4%
- Charged in 30 min71% vs 45%+58%
- Thickness7.6 mm vs 7.9 mm+4%
- Bluetooth5.4 vs 5.2+4%
Why is T4 better than Narzo 80 Pro?
- Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 7,300 mAh+22%
- AnTuTu score985,745 vs 1,043,525+6%
- Wired charging80 W vs 90 W+12%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,923 vs 3,190+9%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
- 4K selfie videoNo · Narzo 80 Pro: Yes
- Peak brightness4,500 nits vs 5,000 nits+11%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 179 g | 199 g |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 7.9 mm |
| Height | 162.8 mm | 163.4 mm |
| Width | 74.9 mm | 76.4 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP65 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx5 |
| Glass protection | — | Shield Glass |
| Colours | Racing Green, Speed Silver | Emerald Blaze, Phantom Grey |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | OLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,392 px | 2,392 px |
| Pixel density | 391 ppi | 388 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,500 nits | 5,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.6% | 88.8% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 | Qualcomm SM7635 Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.6 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Adreno 810 |
| AnTuTu score | 985,745 | 1,043,525 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,923 | 3,190 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.95" | 1/1.95" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 7,300 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 90 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 71% | 45% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| NFC | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.99 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Realme UI 6.0 | Funtouch 15 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 2 |
