- android.gs
- Compare
- Aquos R10 vs T4
Sharp Aquos R10 vs Vivo T4
What Aquos R10 does better (17) and where T4 wins (7) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Aquos R10T4
| Aquos R10 | T4 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 156 mm | 163.4 mm | −7.4 mm |
| Width | 75 mm | 76.4 mm | −1.4 mm |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 7.9 mm | +1 mm |
| Weight | 197 g | 199 g | −2 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Aquos R10 better than T4?
- Refresh rate240 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- NFCYes · T4: No
- Stereo speakersYes · T4: No
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx5+60%
- Major OS updates promised3 vs 2+50%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Memory card slotYes · T4: No
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · T4: No
- eSIMYes · T4: No
- CPU frequency2.8 GHz vs 2.5 GHz+12%
Why is T4 better than Aquos R10?
- Wired charging36 W vs 90 W2.5×
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 7,300 mAh+46%
- Peak brightness3,000 nits vs 5,000 nits+67%
- 4K selfie videoNo · Aquos R10: Yes
- Screen size6.5″ vs 6.8″+4%
- Thickness8.9 mm vs 7.9 mm+13%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 197 g | 199 g |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 7.9 mm |
| Height | 156 mm | 163.4 mm |
| Width | 75 mm | 76.4 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP65 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx5 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Shield Glass |
| Colours | Cashmere White, Charcoal Black, Trench Beige | Emerald Blaze, Phantom Grey |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | PRO IGZO LTPO OLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 2,392 px |
| Pixel density | 396 ppi | 388 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits | 5,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.6% | 88.8% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7675-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 | Qualcomm SM7635 Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.8 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 732 | Adreno 810 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 1,043,525 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,190 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.55" | 1/1.95" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 7,300 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 36 W | 90 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 45% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.99 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | Funtouch 15 |
| Major OS updates promised | 3 | 2 |
