- android.gs
- Compare
- Narzo 80 Pro vs Aquos R10
Realme Narzo 80 Pro vs Sharp Aquos R10
What Narzo 80 Pro does better (7) and where Aquos R10 wins (12) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.7Display8.5
7.5Camera8.7
8.9Battery6.4
6.7Features9.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Narzo 80 ProAquos R10
| Narzo 80 Pro | Aquos R10 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.8 mm | 156 mm | +6.8 mm |
| Width | 74.9 mm | 75 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 8.9 mm | −1.3 mm |
| Weight | 179 g | 197 g | −18 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Narzo 80 Pro better than Aquos R10?
- Wired charging80 W vs 36 W2.2×
- Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+20%
- Peak brightness4,500 nits vs 3,000 nits+50%
- Weight179 g vs 197 g+10%
- Screen size6.7″ vs 6.5″+3%
- Thickness7.6 mm vs 8.9 mm+17%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
Why is Aquos R10 better than Narzo 80 Pro?
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 240 Hz2×
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- NFCNo · Narzo 80 Pro: Yes
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 50 MP3.1×
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Memory card slotNo · Narzo 80 Pro: Yes
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Narzo 80 Pro: Yes
- eSIMNo · Narzo 80 Pro: Yes
- CPU frequency2.6 GHz vs 2.8 GHz+8%
- USB version2 vs 3.2+60%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 7+40%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 179 g | 197 g |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 8.9 mm |
| Height | 162.8 mm | 156 mm |
| Width | 74.9 mm | 75 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Racing Green, Speed Silver | Cashmere White, Charcoal Black, Trench Beige |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | OLED | PRO IGZO LTPO OLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,392 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 391 ppi | 396 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,500 nits | 3,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.6% | 88.6% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 | Qualcomm SM7675-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.6 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Adreno 732 |
| AnTuTu score | 985,745 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,923 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.95" | 1/1.55" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | — |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 36 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 71% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Realme UI 6.0 | — |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 3 |
