- android.gs
- Compare
- Narzo 80 Lite 5G vs Galaxy A17 4G
Realme Narzo 80 Lite 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A17 4G
What Narzo 80 Lite 5G does better (5) and where Galaxy A17 4G wins (16) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.6Display7.0
3.8Camera7.8
6.6Battery5.3
4.5Features5.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Narzo 80 Lite 5GGalaxy A17 4G
| Narzo 80 Lite 5G | Galaxy A17 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 165.7 mm | 164.4 mm | +1.3 mm |
| Width | 76.2 mm | 77.9 mm | −1.7 mm |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 7.5 mm | +0.4 mm |
| Weight | 197 g | 190 g | +7 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Narzo 80 Lite 5G better than Galaxy A17 4G?
- 5GYes · Galaxy A17 4G: No
- Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+20%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 90 Hz+33%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Galaxy A17 4G: No
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+9%
Why is Galaxy A17 4G better than Narzo 80 Lite 5G?
- Wired charging15 W vs 25 W+67%
- Main camera32 MP vs 50 MP+56%
- OLED panelNo · Narzo 80 Lite 5G: Yes
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationNo · Narzo 80 Lite 5G: Yes
- NFCNo · Narzo 80 Lite 5G: Yes
- RAM6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
- Pixel density264 ppi vs 385 ppi+46%
- Peak brightness625 nits vs 800 nits+28%
- Storage (base)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Narzo 80 Lite 5G: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 197 g | 190 g |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 7.5 mm |
| Height | 165.7 mm | 164.4 mm |
| Width | 76.2 mm | 77.9 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
| Colours | Crystal Purple, Onyx Black | Black, Gray, Light blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,604 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 264 ppi | 385 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 625 nits | 800 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.9% | 86% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 | Mediatek Helio G99 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 526,972 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,052 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 32 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/3.1" | 1/2.76" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 15 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 44% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.37 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | One UI 7 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 6 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | A |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,200 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 52 h |
| Repairability class | — | C |
| Drop resistance class | — | B |
