- android.gs
- Compare
- Narzo 70 Pro vs Galaxy A06
Realme Narzo 70 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy A06
What Narzo 70 Pro does better (20) and where Galaxy A06 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.2Display3.1
8.0Camera4.6
7.2Battery5.4
5.8Features3.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Narzo 70 ProGalaxy A06
| Narzo 70 Pro | Galaxy A06 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163 mm | 167.3 mm | −4.3 mm |
| Width | 75.5 mm | 77.3 mm | −1.8 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8 mm | = |
| Weight | 195 g | 189 g | +6 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Narzo 70 Pro better than Galaxy A06?
- Wired charging67 W vs 25 W2.7×
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 60 Hz2×
- Peak brightness2,000 nits vs 450 nits4.4×
- OLED panelYes · Galaxy A06: No
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationYes · Galaxy A06: No
- 5GYes · Galaxy A06: No
- Stereo speakersYes · Galaxy A06: No
- RAM8 GB vs 6 GB+33%
- Pixel density395 ppi vs 262 ppi+51%
- CPU frequency2.6 GHz vs 2 GHz+30%
- Process6 nm vs 12 nm2×
Why is Galaxy A06 better than Narzo 70 Pro?
- Memory card slotNo · Narzo 70 Pro: Yes
- Weight195 g vs 189 g+3%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 195 g | 189 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 163 mm | 167.3 mm |
| Width | 75.5 mm | 77.3 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Colours | Green, Gold | Blue, Gold, White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | PLS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 1,600 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 262 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2,000 nits | 450 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 564 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87.3% | 83.8% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 | Mediatek Helio G85 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.6 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 182,064 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,273 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 188 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | — | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/2.76" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 13.8 h |
| Wired charging | 67 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 79% | 43% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -27.7 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.44 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | realme UI 5.0 | One UI 8 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 2 |
