- android.gs
- Compare
- Narzo 70 Pro vs Galaxy A55
Realme Narzo 70 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy A55
What Narzo 70 Pro does better (6) and where Galaxy A55 wins (11) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.2Display7.4
8.0Camera8.3
7.2Battery5.0
5.8Features8.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Narzo 70 ProGalaxy A55
| Narzo 70 Pro | Galaxy A55 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163 mm | 161.1 mm | +1.9 mm |
| Width | 75.5 mm | 77.4 mm | −1.9 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8.2 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Weight | 195 g | 213 g | −18 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Narzo 70 Pro better than Galaxy A55?
- Wired charging67 W vs 25 W2.7×
- Peak brightness2,000 nits vs 1,000 nits2×
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Galaxy A55: No
- Weight195 g vs 213 g+9%
- Charged in 30 min79% vs 55%+44%
- Thickness8 mm vs 8.2 mm+2%
Why is Galaxy A55 better than Narzo 70 Pro?
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- NFCNo · Narzo 70 Pro: Yes
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx7+75%
- Memory card slotNo · Narzo 70 Pro: Yes
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
- 4K selfie videoNo · Narzo 70 Pro: Yes
- eSIMNo · Narzo 70 Pro: Yes
- CPU frequency2.6 GHz vs 2.75 GHz+6%
- Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 195 g | 213 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 163 mm | 161.1 mm |
| Width | 75.5 mm | 77.4 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | IP67 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx7 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
| Colours | Green, Gold | Iceblue, Lilac, Navy, Lemon |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 390 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2,000 nits | 1,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,010 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87.3% | 85.8% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 | Exynos 1480 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Exynos |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.6 GHz | 2.75 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Xclipse 530 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 635,598 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,259 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 1,024 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Active use (test) | — | 13.4 h |
| Wired charging | 67 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 79% | 55% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -25.7 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.68 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | realme UI 5.0 | One UI 8.5 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 4 |
