- android.gs
- Compare
- Narzo 60 vs Galaxy M54
Realme Narzo 60 vs Samsung Galaxy M54
What Narzo 60 does better (6) and where Galaxy M54 wins (13) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.2Display7.6
6.1Camera8.8
6.0Battery7.5
7.1Features7.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Narzo 60Galaxy M54
| Narzo 60 | Galaxy M54 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 159.8 mm | 164.9 mm | −5.1 mm |
| Width | 72.9 mm | 77.3 mm | −4.4 mm |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 8.4 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Weight | 182 g | 199 g | −17 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Narzo 60 better than Galaxy M54?
- Wired charging33 W vs 25 W+32%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Galaxy M54: No
- Weight182 g vs 199 g+9%
- Pixel density409 ppi vs 393 ppi+4%
- Charged in 30 min52% vs 32%+62%
- Thickness7.9 mm vs 8.4 mm+6%
Why is Galaxy M54 better than Narzo 60?
- Main camera64 MP vs 108 MP+69%
- Optical stabilisationNo · Narzo 60: Yes
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+20%
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Narzo 60: Yes
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
- 4K selfie videoNo · Narzo 60: Yes
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+9%
- Screen size6.4″ vs 6.7″+4%
- Process7 nm vs 5 nm+40%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 182 g | 199 g |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 8.4 mm |
| Height | 159.8 mm | 164.9 mm |
| Width | 72.9 mm | 77.3 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Mars Orange, Cosmic Black | Dark Blue, Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.4″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 409 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 800 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.7% | 85% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6020 | Exynos 1380 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Exynos |
| Process | 7 nm | 5 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G68 MP5 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 756,067 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,895 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 799 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | 1/1.67" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 52% | 32% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.49 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | realme UI 4.0 | One UI 8 |
