- android.gs
- Compare
- Narzo 60 vs Galaxy A34
Realme Narzo 60 vs Samsung Galaxy A34
What Narzo 60 does better (8) and where Galaxy A34 wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.2Display7.5
6.1Camera7.7
6.0Battery5.3
7.1Features7.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Narzo 60Galaxy A34
| Narzo 60 | Galaxy A34 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 159.8 mm | 161.3 mm | −1.5 mm |
| Width | 72.9 mm | 78.1 mm | −5.2 mm |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 8.2 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Weight | 182 g | 199 g | −17 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Narzo 60 better than Galaxy A34?
- Main camera64 MP vs 48 MP+33%
- Wired charging33 W vs 25 W+32%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Galaxy A34: No
- Weight182 g vs 199 g+9%
- Pixel density409 ppi vs 390 ppi+5%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 13 MP+23%
- Charged in 30 min52% vs 49%+6%
- Thickness7.9 mm vs 8.2 mm+4%
Why is Galaxy A34 better than Narzo 60?
- Optical stabilisationNo · Narzo 60: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · Narzo 60: Yes
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Narzo 60: Yes
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- 4K selfie videoNo · Narzo 60: Yes
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.6 GHz+18%
- Screen size6.4″ vs 6.6″+3%
- Process7 nm vs 6 nm+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 182 g | 199 g |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 159.8 mm | 161.3 mm |
| Width | 72.9 mm | 78.1 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP67 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx7 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Mars Orange, Cosmic Black | Lime, Graphite, Violet, Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.4″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 409 ppi | 390 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,009 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.7% | 84.9% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6020 | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 7 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 472,126 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,316 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 639 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 52% | 49% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -26.1 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.55 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | realme UI 4.0 | One UI 8.5 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 4 |
