- android.gs
- Compare
- Narzo 60 Pro vs Poco F5
Realme Narzo 60 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco F5
What Narzo 60 Pro does better (2) and where Poco F5 wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.6Display7.6
7.9Camera8.4
7.2Battery5.4
8.7Features6.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Narzo 60 ProPoco F5
| Narzo 60 Pro | Poco F5 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.6 mm | 161.1 mm | +0.5 mm |
| Width | 73.9 mm | 75 mm | −1.1 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 7.9 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Weight | 185 g | 181 g | +4 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Narzo 60 Pro better than Poco F5?
- Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 256 GB4×
- Main camera100 MP vs 64 MP+56%
Why is Poco F5 better than Narzo 60 Pro?
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Narzo 60 Pro: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Narzo 60 Pro: Yes
- CPU frequency2.6 GHz vs 2.91 GHz+12%
- Peak brightness950 nits vs 1,000 nits+5%
- Weight185 g vs 181 g+2%
- Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
- Thickness8.2 mm vs 7.9 mm+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 185 g | 181 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 7.9 mm |
| Height | 161.6 mm | 161.1 mm |
| Width | 73.9 mm | 75 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | Double-reinforced glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Mars Orange, Cosmic Black | Black, Blue, White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,412 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 394 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 950 nits | 1,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 963 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.5% | 88.9% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 | Qualcomm SM7475-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.6 GHz | 2.91 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Adreno 725 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 931,174 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,939 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 1,956 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 100 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 11.9 h |
| Wired charging | 67 W | 67 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 65% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -24.3 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.99 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | realme UI 4.0 | HyperOS |
