- android.gs
- Compare
- Narzo 60 Pro vs Phantom X2 Pro
Realme Narzo 60 Pro vs Tecno Phantom X2 Pro
What Narzo 60 Pro does better (10) and where Phantom X2 Pro wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.6Display7.4
7.9Camera8.2
7.2Battery7.8
8.7Features7.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Narzo 60 ProPhantom X2 Pro
| Narzo 60 Pro | Phantom X2 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.6 mm | 164.6 mm | −3 mm |
| Width | 73.9 mm | 72.7 mm | +1.2 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 9 mm | −0.8 mm |
| Weight | 185 g | 201 g | −16 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Narzo 60 Pro better than Phantom X2 Pro?
- Main camera100 MP vs 50 MP2×
- Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 256 GB4×
- Wired charging67 W vs 45 W+49%
- Optical stabilisationYes · Phantom X2 Pro: No
- Stereo speakersYes · Phantom X2 Pro: No
- Peak brightness950 nits vs 500 nits+90%
- Weight185 g vs 201 g+9%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 5+20%
- Thickness8.2 mm vs 9 mm+10%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
Why is Phantom X2 Pro better than Narzo 60 Pro?
- Telephoto cameraNo · Narzo 60 Pro: Yes
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 5,160 mAh+3%
- Rear cameras1 vs 33×
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Narzo 60 Pro: Yes
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
- CPU frequency2.6 GHz vs 3.05 GHz+17%
- Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
- Screen-to-body ratio90.5% vs 93.3%+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 185 g | 201 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 9 mm |
| Height | 161.6 mm | 164.6 mm |
| Width | 73.9 mm | 72.7 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Aluminium |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Glass protection | Double-reinforced glass | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Colours | Mars Orange, Cosmic Black | Stardust Gray, Mars Orange |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,412 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 394 ppi | 387 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 950 nits | 500 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 505 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.5% | 93.3% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 | Mediatek Dimensity 9000 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.6 GHz | 3.05 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali-G710 MC10 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 961,576 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,984 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 100 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.3" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 2.5× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,160 mAh |
| Wired charging | 67 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 81% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -29.3 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | realme UI 4.0 | HiOS 8.6 |
