- android.gs
- Compare
- Narzo 60 Pro vs V29
Realme Narzo 60 Pro vs Vivo V29
What Narzo 60 Pro does better (7) and where V29 wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.6Display8.8
7.9Camera8.5
7.2Battery6.3
8.7Features7.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
Narzo 60 ProV29
| Narzo 60 Pro | V29 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.6 mm | 164.2 mm | −2.6 mm |
| Width | 73.9 mm | 74.4 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 7.5 mm | +0.7 mm |
| Weight | 185 g | 186 g | −1 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Narzo 60 Pro better than V29?
- Main camera100 MP vs 50 MP2×
- Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Stereo speakersYes · V29: No
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 4,600 mAh+9%
- CPU frequency2.6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz+8%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 5+20%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
Why is V29 better than Narzo 60 Pro?
- Wired charging67 W vs 80 W+19%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 50 MP3.1×
- Peak brightness950 nits vs 1,300 nits+37%
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Narzo 60 Pro: Yes
- eSIMNo · Narzo 60 Pro: Yes
- Pixel density394 ppi vs 453 ppi+15%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,260 px+17%
- Thickness8.2 mm vs 7.5 mm+9%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 185 g | 186 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 7.5 mm |
| Height | 161.6 mm | 164.2 mm |
| Width | 73.9 mm | 74.4 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Glass |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Double-reinforced glass | — |
| Colours | Mars Orange, Cosmic Black | Space Black, Himalayan Blue, Purple Fairy, Majestic Red |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,260 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,412 px | 2,800 px |
| Pixel density | 394 ppi | 453 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 950 nits | 1,300 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 996 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.5% | 90.8% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.6 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Adreno 642L |
| AnTuTu score | — | 544,639 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,797 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 100 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 4,600 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 67 W | 80 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 88% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -28.7 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.94 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | realme UI 4.0 | Funtouch 13 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 3 |
