- android.gs
- Compare
- Narzo 50 Pro vs Pova 4 Pro
Realme Narzo 50 Pro vs Tecno Pova 4 Pro
What Narzo 50 Pro does better (9) and where Pova 4 Pro wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.2Display6.3
6.0Camera4.6
6.0Battery8.2
6.6Features5.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Narzo 50 ProPova 4 Pro
| Narzo 50 Pro | Pova 4 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 160.2 mm | 164.8 mm | −4.6 mm |
| Width | 73.3 mm | 77 mm | −3.7 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 9.2 mm | −1.2 mm |
| Weight | 181 g | 211 g | −30 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Narzo 50 Pro better than Pova 4 Pro?
- 5GYes · Pova 4 Pro: No
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Pova 4 Pro: No
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 8 MP2×
- Weight181 g vs 211 g+17%
- CPU frequency2.5 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+14%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 4+50%
- Thickness8 mm vs 9.2 mm+15%
- Bluetooth5.2 vs 5+4%
Why is Pova 4 Pro better than Narzo 50 Pro?
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- NFCNo · Narzo 50 Pro: Yes
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+20%
- Wired charging33 W vs 45 W+36%
- Main camera48 MP vs 50 MP+4%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Screen size6.4″ vs 6.7″+4%
- Charged in 30 min48% vs 62%+29%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 181 g | 211 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 9.2 mm |
| Height | 160.2 mm | 164.8 mm |
| Width | 73.3 mm | 77 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | Hyper Blue, Hyper Black | Fluorite Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.4″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,460 px |
| Pixel density | 411 ppi | 403 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 450 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.2% | 83% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 920 | Mediatek Helio G99 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.5 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 556,518 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,047 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 346 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 48% | 62% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | realme UI 3 | HiOS 8.6 |
