- android.gs
- Compare
- Narzo 50 Pro vs Redmi Note 12 Pro
Realme Narzo 50 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro
What Narzo 50 Pro does better (3) and where Redmi Note 12 Pro wins (12) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.2Display7.5
6.0Camera8.1
6.0Battery5.5
6.6Features5.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
Narzo 50 ProRedmi Note 12 Pro
| Narzo 50 Pro | Redmi Note 12 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 160.2 mm | 163 mm | −2.8 mm |
| Width | 73.3 mm | 76 mm | −2.7 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8 mm | = |
| Weight | 181 g | 187 g | −6 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Narzo 50 Pro better than Redmi Note 12 Pro?
- Pixel density411 ppi vs 395 ppi+4%
- Weight181 g vs 187 g+3%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
Why is Redmi Note 12 Pro better than Narzo 50 Pro?
- Wired charging33 W vs 67 W2×
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationNo · Narzo 50 Pro: Yes
- NFCNo · Narzo 50 Pro: Yes
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Main camera48 MP vs 50 MP+4%
- Charged in 30 min48% vs 100%2.1×
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- Screen size6.4″ vs 6.7″+4%
- CPU frequency2.5 GHz vs 2.6 GHz+4%
- Screen-to-body ratio84.2% vs 86.7%+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 181 g | 187 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 160.2 mm | 163 mm |
| Width | 73.3 mm | 76 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | — | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Hyper Blue, Hyper Black | Frosted Blue (Sky Blue), Onyx Black (Midnight Black), Polar White, Stardust Purple |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.4″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 411 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 900 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 890 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.2% | 86.7% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 920 | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.5 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 490,526 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,209 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 629 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 12.1 h |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 67 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 48% | 100% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -26.6 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.99 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | realme UI 3 | MIUI 13 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 2 |
