- android.gs
- Compare
- Narzo 50 Pro vs Camon 20 Pro 5G
Realme Narzo 50 Pro vs Tecno Camon 20 Pro 5G
What Narzo 50 Pro does better (6) and where Camon 20 Pro 5G wins (14) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.2Display7.5
6.0Camera8.1
6.0Battery6.0
6.6Features6.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Narzo 50 ProCamon 20 Pro 5G
| Narzo 50 Pro | Camon 20 Pro 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 160.2 mm | 162.7 mm | −2.5 mm |
| Width | 73.3 mm | 75.9 mm | −2.6 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 7.8 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Weight | 181 g | 193 g | −12 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Narzo 50 Pro better than Camon 20 Pro 5G?
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Camon 20 Pro 5G: No
- Weight181 g vs 193 g+7%
- Pixel density411 ppi vs 395 ppi+4%
- Charged in 30 min48% vs 38%+26%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 5+20%
Why is Camon 20 Pro 5G better than Narzo 50 Pro?
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationNo · Narzo 50 Pro: Yes
- NFCNo · Narzo 50 Pro: Yes
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Main camera48 MP vs 64 MP+33%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Memory card slotNo · Narzo 50 Pro: Yes
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
- CPU frequency2.5 GHz vs 3 GHz+20%
- Screen size6.4″ vs 6.7″+4%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.7+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 181 g | 193 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 160.2 mm | 162.7 mm |
| Width | 73.3 mm | 75.9 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | — |
| Colours | Hyper Blue, Hyper Black | Dark Welkin, Serenity Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.4″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 411 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 900 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.2% | 87% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 920 | Mediatek Dimensity 8050 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.5 GHz | 3 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 1,031,881 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,905 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 1,300 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | 1/1.7" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 48% | 38% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | realme UI 3 | HIOS 14 |
