- android.gs
- Compare
- GT Neo2 vs X60 Pro+
Realme GT Neo2 vs Vivo X60 Pro+
What GT Neo2 does better (6) and where X60 Pro+ wins (11) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
GT Neo2X60 Pro+
| GT Neo2 | X60 Pro+ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.9 mm | 158.6 mm | +4.3 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 73.4 mm | +2.4 mm |
| Thickness | 9 mm | 9.1 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Weight | 200 g | 191 g | +9 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is GT Neo2 better than X60 Pro+?
- Stereo speakersYes · X60 Pro+: No
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 4,200 mAh+19%
- Main camera64 MP vs 50 MP+28%
- Wired charging65 W vs 55 W+18%
- CPU frequency3.2 GHz vs 2.84 GHz+13%
- Loudspeaker loudness-25.1 LUFS vs -27.6 LUFS+-9%
Why is X60 Pro+ better than GT Neo2?
- Optical stabilisationNo · GT Neo2: Yes
- Telephoto cameraNo · GT Neo2: Yes
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,185 vs 3,749+18%
- Measured brightness659 nits vs 816 nits+24%
- Rear cameras2 vs 42×
- Max video4K vs 8K
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
- Weight200 g vs 191 g+5%
- Process7 nm vs 5 nm+40%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.6+12%
- Screen-to-body ratio85.7% vs 89.8%+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 200 g | 191 g |
| Thickness | 9 mm | 9.1 mm |
| Height | 162.9 mm | 158.6 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 73.4 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Aluminium |
| Back | Plastic | Eco leather |
| Ingress protection | IPX5 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | — |
| Colours | Neo Black, Neo Blue, Neo Green | Orange, Emperor Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,376 px |
| Pixel density | 398 ppi | 398 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,300 nits | 1,300 nits |
| Measured brightness | 659 nits | 816 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.7% | 89.8% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 7 nm | 5 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.2 GHz | 2.84 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 660 |
| AnTuTu score | 726,039 | 734,811 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,185 | 3,749 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,228 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.6 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.73" | 1/1.31" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 4 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 5× |
| Max video | 4K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 4,200 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 65 W | 55 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 83% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -25.1 LUFS | -27.6 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.8 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Realme UI 4.0 | Funtouch 12 (International) |
