- android.gs
- Compare
- GT Neo 5 240W vs Redmi K70 Pro
Realme GT Neo 5 240W vs Xiaomi Redmi K70 Pro
What GT Neo 5 240W does better (4) and where Redmi K70 Pro wins (12) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.3Display9.2
8.6Camera8.8
6.8Battery7.8
8.1Features9.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
GT Neo 5 240WRedmi K70 Pro
| GT Neo 5 240W | Redmi K70 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.9 mm | 160.9 mm | +3 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 75 mm | +0.8 mm |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 8.2 mm | +0.7 mm |
| Weight | 199 g | 209 g | −10 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is GT Neo 5 240W better than Redmi K70 Pro?
- Wired charging240 W vs 120 W2×
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
- Charged in 30 min375% vs 167%2.2×
- Weight199 g vs 209 g+5%
Why is Redmi K70 Pro better than GT Neo 5 240W?
- Peak brightness1,400 nits vs 4,000 nits2.9×
- RAM16 GB vs 24 GB+50%
- Telephoto cameraNo · GT Neo 5 240W: Yes
- Battery capacity4,600 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+9%
- Max video4K vs 8K
- Pixel density451 ppi vs 526 ppi+17%
- CPU frequency3.19 GHz vs 3.3 GHz+3%
- USB version2 vs 3.2+60%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 7+40%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.6+19%
- Resolution (width)1,240 px vs 1,440 px+16%
- Thickness8.9 mm vs 8.2 mm+9%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 199 g | 209 g |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 163.9 mm | 160.9 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 75 mm |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Colours | Purple, Black, White | Black, Silver, Blue/Green, Lamborgini Green, Lamborgini Yellow |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | OLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,240 px | 1,440 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,772 px | 3,200 px |
| Pixel density | 451 ppi | 526 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,400 nits | 4,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,016 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87.9% | 89% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.19 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 750 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 2,486,114 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 7,192 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 4,359 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 24 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.6 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.55" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 2× |
| Max video | 4K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,600 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 240 W | 120 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 375% | 167% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | realme UI 4.0 | HyperOS |
